Day: December 17, 2020

  • New Kavala hearing: a symptom of Turkey’s gangrened justice system

    New Kavala hearing: a symptom of Turkey’s gangrened justice system

    Tomorrow, Friday 18 December 2020, marks the 1,144th day of detention for human rights defender Osman Kavala.

    On the same day, the first hearing of his trial based on the October 2020 indictment (see recent developments section below) will take place: if convicted Mr. Kavala risks a life-long prison term.

    Mr Kavala’s case is just one example which reveals the deep dysfunctionality and politicisation of Turkey’s legal system. The control of Legislative and Executive powers over the appointment of judges and prosecutors, contrary to international standards of judicial independence, means that human rights defenders and figures of independent civil society, including Mr Kavala, are kept behind bars indefinitely.

    The October 2020 indictment against Mr Kavala lacks any causal relation between the information provided and the crimes with which Osman Kavala is charged. It also targets Anadolu Kultur, a non-profit cultural organisation founded by Mr Kavala. The public prosecutor has called Anadolu Kultur’s activities “divisive” and discriminatory because they focus on the cultural rights of minority groups in Turkey.

    The 64-page indictment accuses Mr Kavala of “securing, for purposes of political or military espionage, information that should be kept confidential for reasons relating to the security or domestic or foreign policy interests of the state” without any credible evidence. Mr. Kavala also stands accused of “attempting through force and violence to overthrow the constitutional order of the Republic of Turkey or introduce a different order or prevent this order”. Under articles 328 and 309 of the Turkish Penal Code, these are punishable with up to 20 years imprisonment and life in prison without parole, respectively.

    This new hearing takes place a year after the European Court of Human Rights issued its binding judgement which stated that Mr Kavala’s detention had an “ulterior purpose, namely to reduce him to silence as an NGO activist and human rights defender, to dissuade other persons from engaging in such activities and to paralyse civil society in the country”. Accordingly, the European court called for Mr Kavala’s immediate release, which Turkey has ignored. Tomorrow’s hearing demonstrates only one thing: the authorities’ flagrant travesty of the courts for political ends and their fundamental disregard for due process, human rights, fundamental freedoms, and respect for the rule of law.

    We, the undersigned human rights organisations, believe that the only just outcome in the unfair prosecution against Mr. Kavala is his acquittal and call on the authorities to uphold its domestic and international commitments, and dismiss all charges against the human rights defender.

    List of signatories

    EuroMed Rights
    Human Rights Association
    Citizens’ Assembly
    Civil Rights Defenders
    Research Institute on Turkey
    Turkish German Forum of Culture
    IFoX Initiative for Freedom of Expression
    AMER (Association for Monitoring Equal Rights)
    Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA)
    Truth Justice Memory Center
    Civic Space Studies Association
    P24
    FIDH, within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
    OMCT (World Organisation Against Torture), within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
    POMED

    Recent developments on Mr Kavala’s case

    The trial beginning in Istanbul tomorrow, Friday 18 December 2020, was scheduled following a decision taken in October 2020 to issue an indictment against Mr Kavala. On 15 December 2020, the first chamber of the Constitutional Court, tasked of reviewing the constitutional legality of Mr Kavala’s continued detention, referred the case to the General Assembly of the Constitutional Court.

    Early December 2020, the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers issued a strongly worded resolution demanding the authorities to immediately release Mr Kavala who is held in pre-trial detention since 1 November 2017. The Council of Europe Committee of Ministers noted that Turkey had failed to challenge the presumption that Mr Kavala’s detention is a continuation of the violations found by the European Court of Human Rights. They denounced the inaction from the Turkey’s Constitutional Court.

    Despite the European Court of Human Rights’ ruling and the threat posed by the current pandemic worldwide, Turkey’s authorities disregarded its international obligations as well as the health risk of keeping Mr Kavala in prison (aged 63, over 3 years in prison). This decision openly infringes on the United Nations Human Rights Committee stance on the failure of a state in taking positive steps towards the prevention of the spread of contagious diseases in prison would amount to a violation of Article 6 (right to life) and Article 9 (right to liberty) of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

  • Joint statement on the killing of Tahir Elçi

    Joint statement on the killing of Tahir Elçi

    Research Institute on Turkey joins 42 other organizations in a statement concerning the killing of human rights lawyer Tahir Elçi on 28 November 2015 and the lack of effective investigation into his death. Providing a detailed analysis of the shortcomings of the investigation and prosecution into the incident and underlining Turkey’s international human rights obligations, the organizations call on the Turkish authorities to ensure that:

    1. The case against 3 police officers is heard by an independent, impartial, and competent court that is capable of establishing the facts and truth around the killing of Tahir Elçi;

    2. All future hearings comply with international standards regarding the right to a fair trial, in which the victims’ rights are also recognized;

    3. The hostile attitude from the Diyarbakır 10th Heavy Penal Court towards the Elçi family and their lawyers and the court’s persistent refusal to follow the rules of procedure and principles of both domestic and international law are not repeated in future hearings;

    4. The lawyers for the Elçi family are given reasonable opportunities to be heard and to make their applications in relation to the procedure and the evidence;

    5. Where submissions are refused, reasons for refusal are given in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights;

    6. Following a fair judicial procedure, those who are responsible for Mr. Elçi’s killing are held accountable and serve sentences appropriate to the gravity of the crime committed; and

    7. Mr. Elçi’s family is provided with appropriate redress for the violations they and their loved one have suffered in accordance with the international obligations of Turkey and the Minnesota Protocol.

    The full statement is available in English here, and Turkish here.

    The statement has been signed by the following organizations: Amsterdam Bar Association (the Netherlands), Article 19, Article 21 (Italy), Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales (the United Kingdom), Cartoonists Rights Network International, Council of Bars and Law Societies in Europe (CCBE), Danish PEN, the European Association of Lawyers (AEA-EAL), European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights (ELDH), the European Bars Federation (FBE) and FBE Human Rights Commission, European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA), Fair Trial Watch (the Netherlands), Gelderland Bar Association (the Netherlands), Geneva Bar Association (Switzerland), German Bar Association (DAV) (Germany), Giuristi Democratici (Italy), the Group of International Legal Intervention (GIGI), the Hague Bar Association (the Netherlands), Human Rights in Practice (the Netherlands), the Institute for the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers (UIA-IROL), the International Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL), the International Observatory of Human Rights (IOHR), Index on Censorship, International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL), the joint Presidents of the Local Bar Associations of the Netherlands, the Law Society of England and Wales (the United Kingdom), Lawyers for Lawyers (the Netherlands), Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada (Canada), Limburg Bar Association (the Netherlands), Midden-Nederland Bar Association (the Netherlands), the National Association of Democratic Lawyers (South Africa), National Forensic Union M. G. A. (Italy), National Lawyers Guild International Committee (the United States of America), Netherlands Helsinki Committee (the Netherlands), Noord-Holland Bar Association (the Netherlands), Noord-Nederland Bar Association (the Netherlands), Oost-Brabant Bar Association (the Netherlands), Overijssel Bar Association (the Netherlands), Research Institute on Turkey (the United States of America), Rotterdam Bar Association (the Netherlands), Swiss Democratic Lawyers (Switzerland), Turkey Human Rights Litigation Support Project (the United Kingdom), and Zeeland-West-Brabant Bar Association (the Netherlands).